RSS

The Concept of Heaven is Immoral

28 Jul
File:Paradiso Canto 31.jpg
 
What's that you say? Heaven is immoral? Yeah, I think so, and for the same reason that most people believe that hell is immoral.
 
Why is hell, or the concept of hell, immoral? It's not that punishment per se is immoral, it's that a punishment disproportionate to the offense charged is immoral. So, if I'm living in NYC in the early 90s, and someone steps on my new, clean, $200 Air Jordans, it would be immoral for me to pull out a gun and shoot that person. But if I stop the person and say “Yo, you stepped on my bleach white $200 Air Jordans, G!” and demand some sort of verbal apology, then this would be a more appropriate response.
 
With the concept of hell, we have the same disproportionate response to some sort of slight. What could possibly warrant burning or being tortured for all eternity? Since the god of the modern hell-proponent religions is described as being infinite, the theologians of those religions claim that the punishment for offending an infinite being should also be infinite. But of course, this logic doesn't hold.
 
Imagine Godzilla rampaging through Tokyo, and some random Japanese guy yells at Godzilla while running away “You suck!”. What has that insult done to Godzilla's ego, assuming he understands poorly dubbed Japanese? He's fuckin' GODZILLA. It's like the equivalent of throwing a rock at him; he probably wouldn't even notice. On the other hand, if King Ghidra comes flying down from space and is like “You suck!” and hits Godzilla with one of his lightening-breath attacks, Godzilla might feel threatened since they are of similar stature. And then it's on.
 
Or, keeping with the infinity theme, if I stole a dollar from a person that had infinite money, then I should be punished with the crime of theft; I shouldn't be punished because I robbed someone with infininte money as opposed to someone who only makes $70,000 a year. Some might even argue that I really didn't make the person with infinite money lose any “property” or net worth because they have infinite money.
 
Of course, who in their right mind would demand that, since I stole a dollar from someone who had infinite money, I should be punished by having to give infinite money back to the guy who had infinite money?
 
So back to this infinite god. What could a finite crime committed against an infinite god actually rob from this infinite god? What has this infinite god lost? The god is infinite; he has an unlimited supply of whatever it is that makes him infinite. Any sort of offense would be like dividing infinity by any finite number. The god is still left with infinity. If anything, any punishment would be infinitely disproportionate – thus infinitely immoral. On the other side of that, assuming that any god who gets offended has to punish at all implies that this god has lost something. Any god that has the ability to lose something would not be infinite.
 
Alora. If this analogy with infinite money holds, then its flip side – giving someone with infinite money a dollar – should also hold.
 
What exactly has the person with infinite money gained by me giving them a dollar? They have infinite money. If we want to maintain justice, then I should be rewarded in the same exact fashion that I would be rewarded if I gave a dollar to a person that makes $70,000 a year. But most of us would decry any sort of reward given to a person who gave someone with infinite money an “extra” dollar (how many of us congratulate millionaires or billionaires if/when they win the lottery?). Giving a better reward for giving a person with infinite money a dollar as opposed to the guy that only makes $70,000 a year  – when they don't actually gain anything – would be a disproportionate reward scheme and would actually be unjust, unfair, and could possibly even be considered immoral. It would be similarly infinitely disproportional, and subsequently infinitely immoral.
 
Like I wrote above, since the concept of hell is a disproportionate punishment this implies unfairness and this is why many people see it as being immoral. Likewise, the concept of heaven is equally as unfair, and should be seen as equally immoral. What sort of value could I add to an infinite god that he would notice any sort of boon? Again, the god is infinite; it would be like multiplying infinity by any sort of finite number. It might make sense to a 10 year old (i.e. “I'm awesome times infinity!” “Yeah, well I'm awesome times infinity plus one!“) but that doesn't work in the real world.
 
What's worse, what would happen in the real world if we awarded people who gave these hypothetical infinite money fatcats a dollar with infinite money themselves? People would be falling all over themselves to buy their one-dollar ticket to infinite money. All sorts of otherwise apathetic or truly immoral people would be quick to pay lip service or give their dollar to the guy with infinite money. Just like people would be walking on eggshells around the guy who would punish them infinitely if they were to have even thought of stealing a dollar from the guy with infinite money.
 
Make no mistake. Any liberal Christians who think that hell is immoral should be similarly outraged at the concept of heaven. If the concept of hell is immoral, then the concept of heaven is immoral as well.
Advertisements
 
2 Comments

Posted by on July 28, 2011 in apologetics

 

2 responses to “The Concept of Heaven is Immoral

  1. beowulf2k8

    August 7, 2011 at 2:53 am

    The difference is obvious. Nobody sees and outrageously generous thing as immoral, but an outrageously mean thing obviously is immoral. I mean, if a rich man came and stold all your property because you insulted him, everyone would say that was immoral. But if he put you in his will or wrote you a check for a million dollars just for complimenting him, nobody would say that was immoral. They might say he was stupid and wasting his money, but they wouldn't call him immoral.

     
  2. beowulf2k8

    August 7, 2011 at 2:55 am

    However, when it comes to letting criminals off the hook, there is immorality. To let a murderer or rapists into heaven, would indeed be immoral. But the problem is not with the concept of heaven, but with the concept of easy forgiveness of every crime, and in particular with justification by faith alone. Those who teach that good people go to heaven are not teaching anything immoral. Those who teach that immoral people can get to heaven, are teaching rank immorality.

     
 
NeuroLogica Blog

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

Slate Star Codex

NꙮW WITH MꙮRE MULTIꙮCULAR ꙮ

Κέλσος

Matthew Ferguson Blogs

The Wandering Scientist

Just another WordPress.com site

NT Blog

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

Euangelion Kata Markon

A blog dedicated to the academic study of the "Gospel According to Mark"

PsyPost

Behavior, cognition and society

PsyBlog

Understand your mind with the science of psychology -

Vridar

Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science

Maximum Entropy

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

atheist, polyamorous skeptics

Criticism is not uncivil

Say..

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

Research Digest

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

Disrupting Dinner Parties

Feminism is for everyone!

My ὑπομνήματα about religion

The New Oxonian

Religion and Culture for the Intellectually Impatient

The Musings of Thomas Verenna

A Biblioblog about imitation, the Biblical Narratives, and the figure of Jesus

%d bloggers like this: